Water Crises Warrants River Ethics

By Asit Biswas, Cecilia Tortajada 25 June, 2024

Can we better our river ethics & management as a solution to the global water crisis? In this China Daily article, Biswas & Tortajada explore the current progress & evolution of river management in China & around the world

River management has been dependent on what’s expedient & cheap, rather than what's best for a country in the long run, without ethical considerations playing any role; pollution of rivers was also seen as a price to be paid for economic growth
But perspectives have evolved: in 2009 China’s Minister of Water Resources proposed rivers be viewed as vital beings, in 2017 New Zealand granted legal personhood to the Whanganui River, and India & Bangladesh followed suit
Developments in different countries show there are many ways in which the principles and practices of river ethics will evolve in the future, contributing to truly sustainable development

The article was first published in China Daily in June 2024. Click here to view.


The world faces a grave water crisis, both in magnitude and extent. Though there are many reasons behind this sad situation, three stand out.

First, the global population has continued to increase, along with commercial and industrial activities. Water is essential for the survival of humans and ecosystems. All important human activities need water, including food production, power generation, and industrial and commercial activities. With increasing population and urbanization, water requirements to support these activities have increased as well.

Water management practices are inefficient across the world, but there’ve been improvements e.g. China’s water consumption per 10k yuan GDP declined 33.4%

Second, water management practices are inefficient across the world, though the situation in a few countries such as China and Singapore has been steadily improving, especially in the post-2010 period. For example, water consumption in terms of per 10,000 yuan ($1,408) of GDP and per 10,000 yuan of industrial added value in China declined by 33.4 percent and 50.3 percent, respectively, between 2015 and 2022. But even after this remarkable achievement, there is still much room for improving efficiency in all sectors.

And third, the impacts of climate change on water sources are far worse than what was expected even in 2020. This will make water management much more complex and uncertain, but most countries are not prepared enough to overcome or adequately handle these impacts and realize carbon neutrality within the next two to four decades.

Global situation of river management

Historically, river management has been basically dependent on what has been expedient and cheap, rather than what is best for a country in the long run, without ethical considerations playing any role in river management.

River mgmt’s been dependent on what’s expedient & cheap, rather than what’s best for a country in the long run

A good example of expedient management is the discharge of untreated or partially treated wastewater into rivers. Consequently, rivers all over the world have become increasingly polluted, impacting human health and aquatic ecosystems. For example, the Cuyahoga River in the United States caught fire at least 13 times and was declared a fire hazard, because of the indiscriminate discharge of industrial wastes such as oil and grease into the river. The last time the river caught fire was in June 1969.

The Cuyahoga River caught fire at least 13x due to pollution…

…yet till 1970, river pollution was seen as a price to be paid for economic growth

Sadly, at least until 1970, pollution of rivers around the world was considered a price to be paid for economic growth. Industrial development was linked to prosperity and job creation in cities on the banks of the rivers.

It was in the early 1970s that developed countries realized the environment had to be protected for long-term economic and social well-being, with many of them making commendable progress in cleaning up polluted rivers and lakes during the 1970-2000 period.

A need to view rivers as vital beings

Developing countries, on the other hand, have made limited progress in cleaning up rivers. As a result, rivers passing through or near urban centers have continued to get more polluted. Consequently, river management thinking has gradually evolved, especially in terms of managing water quality. But despite the significant evolution of river management, commensurate progress in river ethics remains conspicuous by its absence.

When Li Guoying proposed that rivers should be viewed as vital beings that have inherent value, it was highly controversial

In 2009, Li Guoying, then with the Chinese Yellow River Conservancy Commission and now China’s Minister of Water Resources, proposed that rivers should be viewed as vital beings so that society recognized the initiative, teleonomy, and creativeness of rivers, which means rivers also have inherent value (s) and are subject of rights. He noted, though, that expanding the object of moral concern to natural beings like rivers (mountains) is highly controversial in academia and with the public.

At the second United Nations Water Conference in New York in March 2023, Li proposed four important initiatives, including the need to respect the rights of rivers in nature, regard rivers as life forms, construct river ethics, maintain the healthy life of rivers and realize the harmonious coexistence of people and rivers.

And at the World Water Forum, in Bali, Indonesia, in May 2024, he said there is a need to develop a community of good practices on river ethics across the world.

New Zealand making good progress on river ethics

A country that has made good progress in developing water ethics is New Zealand. In 2017, the New Zealand government granted legal personhood to the Whanganui River — the first time in history that an inanimate object like a river was accorded the legal status of a person. According to the Te Awa Tupua Act (Whanganui River Claims Settlement Act) of 2017, the river and  its environment are recognized as living beings called Te Awa Tupua.

In 2017 the NZ govt granted legal personhood to the Whanganui River…

…a global first for an inanimate object

In fact, the Whanganui River from the mountains to the sea, its tributaries, and all its physical and spiritual elements are recognized as “a living and indivisible whole” having similar legal rights and responsibilities as any living person. The members of the Whanganui tribe who live along this 290-kilometre-long river and its tributaries have had a deep connection with the river for at least 900 years, meaning their association with the river began 700 years before the first European settlers arrived in New Zealand.

The Whanganui tribe takes its name, spirit and strength from the river, and its members rely on the river for much of their food and have built villages on its banks. For them, the river is a “highway” that connects the tribes. They consider the river to be their ancestor and spiritual mentor and use its water to heal the sick. The local Maori people have a saying “I am the river, and the river is me.”

Under the Te Awa Tupua Act, two people (one representative each of Whanganui Iwi tribe and the New Zealand government) are the river’s spokespersons, and their duty is to protect its interest and the environment around it.

Pioneering act inspires others

The Te Awa Tupua Act has been a pioneer in managing rivers. Encouraged by this development, the Uttarakhand High Court in India has granted legal personhood to River Ganges within the territory of Uttarakhand province. Similarly, Bangladesh has provided legal personhood to all its rivers.

The Ganges has been granted legal personhood within Uttarakhand & Bangladesh has provided legal personhood to all its rivers

The granting of legal personhood to an inanimate object such as a river, and appointment of spokespersons to speak on its behalf will likely help protect the river and the riparian environment.

China has been developing its river ethics with its own unique national characteristics to ensure that the technical, economic, environmental and ethical aspects of rivers are properly taken care of, which should further improve its current river management practices.

Developments in different countries show there are many ways in which the principles and practices of river ethics will evolve in the future…

…contributing to truly sustainable development

The developments in China and New Zealand, and some other countries, show there are many ways in which the principles and practices of river ethics will evolve in the future. This will ensure the survival, health, and integrity of the ecosystems of rivers. Simultaneously, rivers and the ecosystems around them will contribute to high-quality development, contributing to truly sustainable development in not only China but also the rest of the world, by bringing significantly more benefits to a much larger number of people. This in turn will help protect the interests of both humans and nature.

Asit K. Biswas is a distinguished visiting professor at the University of Glasgow, UK, director of Water Management International, Singapore and chief executive of Third World Centre for Water Management, Mexico; and Cecilia Tortajada is a professor at the School of Social and Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow.

The views don’t necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.


Further readings

More on Latest

  • 2023 State of Ecology & Environment Report Review – How has China’s water quality progressed in 2023? Check out our review for a blow-by-blow account of water quality movements by key rivers & reservoirs for 2023 as well as historic trends since the release of its 14FYP in 2021
  • 2023 Marine Ecology & Environment Status Review – The marine ecology & environment of China continues to improve, with a remarkable 85% of its coastal waters classified as ‘Excellent/Good’. Dive deeper into our review of MEE’s annual report to learn more
  • 10th World Water Forum Bali 2024 – 5 Key Takeaways – The 10th World Water Forum was held in dreamy Bali but how dreamy was the Forum? Are global water conversations advancing? What were the hot topics? CWR’s McGregor & Low share their 5 key takeaways
Author: Asit Biswas
Prof. Asit K. Biswas is Executive Director at Water Management International Pte Ltd, Singapore; Distinguished Visiting Professor at University of Glasgow, UK, and Chief Executive at Third World Centre for Water Management, Mexico.Prof. Biswas is universally acknowledged as one of the world’s leading authorities on water, food, environment and development-related issues. He has a very distinguished career as an academic; senior public official in Canada; advisor and confidant to Presidents, Prime Ministers and Ministers in 23 countries, six Heads of United Nations Agencies, two Secretaries-General of OECD, several Heads of bilateral aid agencies, and four CEOs or Chairmen of MNCs in Fortune 500 list.Among his numerous international awards are Crystal Drop and Millennium prizes of the International Water Resources Association; Walter Huber Prize of American Society of Civil Engineering; Stockholm Water Prize, considered to be the Nobel Prize for water, for “His outstanding and multi-faceted contributions to global water resource issues;” “Person of the Year” award, from Prime Minister Harper of Canada; and Aragon Environment Prize of Spain.Because of his manifold research contributions, he has received seven Honorary Doctorates of Technology or Engineering from leading global universities. He currently has an h-index of 60. Google Scholar lists 1,250 of his publications and over 15,622 citations of his work. He is the author or editor of 89 books, and his work has been translated into 43 languages.
Read more from Asit Biswas →
Author: Cecilia Tortajada
Dr Cecilia Tortajada Honorary Professor on Environmental Science and Sustainability, University of Glasgow, UK.Dr Tortajada has more than 25 years of experience in research, teaching, and consultancy, with a focus on water resources management and its policy, social, economic, and political dimensions. Her current work is on impacts of global changes on water, food and environmental security.Dr Tortajada is an elected member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences of the Vatican. In 2024, she was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Science in Technology by Aalto University, Finland, in recognition of her significant contributions to research and education in water resources and development. She is also a recipient of the Ven Te Chow Memorial Award and Lecture (2025), Crystal Drop Award (2016) and the 50th Anniversary Award (2021) from the International Water Resources Association (IWRA).She serves on several distinguished bodies, including the International Selection Committee of the Millennium Technology Prize (Technology Academy Finland), the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowships Peer Review College (UK), and the OECD Initiative on Water Governance.As a prolific author, her work has been translated into several languages. She is Associate Editor of River Journal and serves on the editorial boards of npj Clean Water, Water Resources Management, Water International, International Journal of Water Governance, Urban, Planning and Transport Research, and the Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research. She also co-edits two book series published by Springer Nature: Water Resources Development and Management and SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development.
Read more from Cecilia Tortajada →